In the lecture and
seminar of this week’s theme, we are mainly talked about what is the theory and what
is the research. In generally, theory
provide an explanatory framework for an observation, is a set of propositions
that aims to identify (abstracts) objects and their relation to each other. There
also have more definitions according to the field it belongs, for examples
scientific theory is based on empirical data to explain the phenomena of
nature, typically is the right fact until other argument with other empirical
data make a falsifiable prediction
related to it; Philosophical theory, without consists in empirical data which are
mainly in the realm of ideas. The theories of philosophical are not tested with
empirical observation. However, professor
Leif give an unexpected definition for what is theory that theory is about looking, in other words, is a way that we
perceiving the world associated to our knowledge and generate an idea, it is
very similar to hypothesis but it is hard to say the difference between theory
and hypothesis, only thing I can explain is that hypothesis is an idea based on
some theories and can be tested, confirmed through theoretic framework. Once a
hypothesis be confirmed, it can be a theory used to propose new hypothesis or
as an evaluation criterion.
Research is a way of gathering data to make an explanation
of theory, it is a theory production somewhat like the relationship between
superstructure and substructure, depending on each other and affecting each
other.
In the lecture,
before the introduction of research, professor Leif ask an interesting question
which is “what is human”. I mean not to discuss the definition but to expound the
meaning of that question. The teacher reference to this topic, in fact, wondering
to discuss the relationship between the three concepts theory, human and research.
In my view, since human is kind of creature that have ability of thinking and
the ability can make their thinking or questioning become truth, thus, a
perfect circulation generated between human, theory and research. Human
observing objects through their eyes and ears to perceive the world, they
generate questions and make hypotheses or theories to define answers, then they
gathering data and knowledge their own to make a research for judgment the
correctness of the things they proposed,
the research reflecting the results to human and human learning and
knowing the world depending on these certified facts, and inspired by them to
propose new questions and theories. Unfortunately, theory may not project the
real of the world, precisely because we are humanities, we can not know the
real meaning of phenomenon or objects in the world. However, the continuous
development of human society attributed to we dared to question everything. In
this theme I learnt that we should not use a Normalism view to examine the world, that is dangerous that we
could get no answering for all. Instead, an eye-opening way is required. Maybe someday a crazy guy will jumped
up and say” the theory of Darwin’s evolution is wrong, I found a new theory and
my research can give the most powerful evidence”. What’s going on? Maybe we
could found the true sense of humanities. Whatever, that is another story.
With so much of your own idea and thought,your essay is of good quality.I really enjoyed reading it.You had a good explanation on theory,such as"In generally, theory provide an explanatory framework for an observation".What interested me most is the discussion on "human".You succesufully grasped the aim of this discussion,which is to discuss the relationship between the three concepts theory, human and research.
ReplyDeleteKeep it up.
With so much of your own idea and thought,your essay is of good quality.I really enjoyed reading it.You had a good explanation on theory,such as"In generally, theory provide an explanatory framework for an observation".What interested me most is the discussion on "human".You succesufully grasped the aim of this discussion,which is to discuss the relationship between the three concepts theory, human and research.
ReplyDeleteKeep it up.
interesting reflections and you linking it back to Normalism as well !
ReplyDeletei think this theme would be so plain without linking it back to philosophy.
we had one person in our seminar raised a question about why did the lecture mention 'what is man' and the answer was because it has no absolute definition to it, like theory. the definition we give is depends on our context. but you point in explaining them are really interesting too. keep it up :)
I agree with the other comments that you got a clear overview of the topic. I guess you summarised the lecture and the seminar and combined it with your own thoughts very well! I like how you refer back to nominalism and create a red line between the topics. I also agree with the definition of theory as a explanatory framework for observation. You struggle with the difference between hypothesis and theory. This is why I like to add that a hypothesis is only a statement which is unproven. A theory on the other hand side is sein thing which is proven in the frames of its given context.
ReplyDeleteYou're one of the few bloggers that I've read so far that managed to reconnect this week's theme to the previous ones, so very well done on that front. The hypothesis and theory difference had me (and most others in my seminar) rather confused as well, but the way I understand it now is that a hypothesis is an assumption you make based on observation, whereas a theory is a way of using academic reasoning to come to an explanation of that observation, thus either confirming or rejecting the hypothesis.
ReplyDelete